AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/297
1Ophthalmology Service, Specialty Hospital. XXI Century National Medical Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security. México City, México.
2Retina and Vitreous Service. Specialty Hospital. XXI Century National Medical Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security. México City, México.
3Medical Research Unit in Metabolic Diseases, Cardiology Hospital. XXI Century National Medical Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security. México City, México.
*Corresponding Author: José D. Méndez, Medical Research Unit in Metabolic Diseases, Cardiology Hospital. XXI Century National Medical Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security. México.
Citation: Montoya Diaz JA, Cedillo Morales VL, Carrillo Martínez JM, Adolfo M. Villar, José D. Méndez, et al, (2025), Clinical Analysis of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in A Mexican Adult Population, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports, 7(9); DOI:10.31579/2690-8794/297
Copyright: © 2025, José D. Méndez. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 21 November 2025 | Accepted: 28 November 2025 | Published: 08 December 2025
Keywords: rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; macular involvement; visual acuity; proliferative vitreoretinopathy
Since rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is one of the most frequent ophthalmological emergencies in Mexico, with an estimated incidence of 6 to 17 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, a retrospective, observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study was conducted. This study included patients over 18 years of age diagnosed with RRD in the ophthalmology department of a tertiary care hospital. Patient assessment notes were collected, analyzing the various clinical characteristics of the anterior and posterior ocular segments. A total of 208 eyes with RRD treated between March 2023 and June 2025 were included in this study. The average age of the patients was 53.6 years, with a predominance of males. Horseshoe tears were the most frequent cause (51.4%), followed by lattice degeneration. These lesions occurred mainly in the upper meridians, while retinal dialysis and operculated holes were in the lower meridians.
Macular involvement was associated with worsening visual acuity (20/2143 vs. 20/83) and greater extent of retinal detachment. Findings such as fixed folds and subretinal bands were more common in cases with a longer disease duration. A positive correlation was observed between extent of retinal detachment and poor vision, but not with disease duration. Myopia was a frequent antecedent, and trauma was mainly related to dialysis. Tobacco dust was the most common finding on physical examination (89.4%). Other abnormalities such as grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), macular involvement (MI), and intraretinal cysts were associated with retinal detachment. Measures of central tendency and standard deviation were used for variable analysis, as well as measures of dispersion in cases of normal-like distribution.
These results suggest that patients seek specialized care late, possibly due to barriers to access and referral. The need for timely detection and prompt referral within the first hours of symptom onset is underscored, as these measures are essential to facilitate specialized management of RRD and improve visual outcomes in the Mexican population.
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is one of the most frequent ophthalmological emergencies. It is defined as the separation of the neurosensory retina from its adjacent layer, which prevents proper visual function.[1,2] This condition occurs due to retinal tearing, allowing vitreous humor to enter and accumulate between the retina and the choroid, thus separating the neurosensory retina from its structural and nutritional substrate.2,3. Risk factors for the development of RRD include moderate myopia, advanced age, and a family or personal history of retinal detachment.2,4,5 Although ocular trauma and a history of previous phacoemulsification are also considered important risk factors.[3,6]
The symptoms experienced by patients with RRD should be part of the knowledge of all healthcare professionals, due to the visual impact of early diagnosis and timely treatment. [1,7] The symptoms that have been classically described in this condition are the sudden appearance of photopsias or floaters, and the progressive and continuous loss of peripheral vision, also described as “curtain vision”. [7,8]
The length of time the retina remains detached, which for practical purposes represents the time from the first symptom until the patient seeks medical attention and retinal surgical reattachment is performed, [6,7] has a significant impact on the patient's visual prognosis, because the loss of nutrient substrate prevents the proper metabolism of the photoreceptors. [9,10] The longer the retina remains detached, the greater the likelihood of permanent damage and the worse the visual prognosis. [4,9] RRD is treated exclusively with surgery; all the techniques described aim to remove the subretinal fluid and reposition the retina, seeking to restore its function. [7,11]
In Mexico, RRD has an incidence of 6.3 to 17.9 per 100,000 inhabitants. Despite the significant visual repercussions of this condition, there are few specific studies on the clinical characteristics of this type of detachment in Mexican population. Therefore, we consider it important to investigate how retinal detachment behaves, emphasizing the initial symptoms and the factors that trigger them. This is essential for training healthcare personnel in primary and secondary care centers. [9,12]
In addition, knowing the average time between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis will allow for the establishment of patient referral protocols to specialized care centers.13 It is necessary to know the clinical characteristics of the posterior segment of retinal detachment at the time of diagnosis, allowing for the evaluation of bridging therapies while the patient is awaiting transfer to a tertiary care center equipped with the necessary resources for definitive treatment, thus improving the patient's final visual prognosis. [13,14]
The assessment notes of Mexican patients over 18 years of age diagnosed with RRD without prior ophthalmic surgery or laser application, who attended the Ophthalmology Service, Specialty Hospital of the National Medical Center Century XXI, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), during the period from March 2023 to June 2025, were retrospectively analyzed. The protocol was registered with the hospital's local research committee under number R-2025-3601-157.
The following variables were considered: 1. Age, 2. Sex, 3. Visual acuity, 4. Affected eye, 5. Duration of symptoms, 6. Presence of floaters, 7. Presence of photopsias, 8. Decreased vision, 9. History of trauma, 10. Previously diagnosed myopia, 11. History of RRD in the contralateral eye, 12. Cellularity in the anterior chamber, 13. Iris synechiae, 14. Retinal pigment epithelium cells in the vitreous, 15. Vitreous hemorrhage, 16. Type of primary retinal break, 17. Retinal detachment mobility, 18. Extent of retinal detachment, 19. Involvement of the macular area, 20. Presence of retinal folds, 21. Presence of intraretinal cysts 22. Presence of subretinal cord.
2.1. Inclusion Criteria. Mexican nationality, Gender not specified, individuals over 18 years of age, beneficiaries of the IMSS, patients diagnosed with DRR, patients with a complete ophthalmological evaluation in electronic medical record, no prior ophthalmological interventions, no prior evaluations or treatments for the pathology under study at the time of the study.
2.2. Exclusion Criteria. History of eye surgery, patients with prior laser treatment, previous retinal diseases, patients with incomplete eye exam.
2.3. Elimination Criteria. Patients whose assessment notes are incomplete, patients without an assessment note in the electronic system, patients who have not decided to continue their care at Oftalmology Service at the Specialty Hospital.
The data were collected and analyzed using the SPSS® Statistics statistical package, version 22.0 for Windows. For all inferential statistical tests, a P-value of less than 0.05 was established as the threshold for considering statistical significance.
To perform the statistical analysis, the visual acuity reported on the Snellen chart was converted to its equivalent in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Visual acuity was converted from Snellen to decimal values following the Holladay equivalence table.[15]
2.4. Ethical aspects.
This study complies with Article 17 of the Regulations of the General Health Law on Research, which establishes that all research conducted must have a scientifically and socially useful purpose. Likewise, the procedures described respect the ethical standards established in the Declaration of Helsinki,[16] similarly, this work is in accordance with the principles contained in the Nuremberg Code.[17] Based on Article 14 of the same regulations, this protocol is classified as retrospective, descriptive, and cross-sectional, and therefore poses no risk to participants. The anonymity of all patients whose data was analyzed in this protocol will be maintained. Patient selection was based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria previously outlined in the selection criteria section.
208 eyes from 208 patients diagnosed with retinal degeneration (RD) treated at the Retina Service of the Division of Ophthalmology were included in this study. Data collection spanned the period from March 2023 to June 2025. The study cohort consisted of 116 men and 92 women.
The mean age of the patients was 53.6 ± 14.6 years (range: 18 to 85 years). Males predominated (55.77% vs. 44.23%). The number of RRD cases presenting according to age was as follows: 62 years (n=12), 67 years (n=10), and 55 years (n=9). The right eye was affected more frequently than the left eye (52.4% vs. 44.2%). The mean visual acuity at admission, expressed in LogMAR, was 1.83 ± 0.83, corresponding to approximately counting fingers at 2 meters (equivalent to 20/1352 on a Snellen chart). The mean duration of symptoms before seeking medical attention was 33.43 ± 48.73 days, with considerable variability (range: 1 to 180 days). 55.3% (n=115) of patients presented with peripheral retinal degenerations in the contralateral eye at the time of initial evaluation. Related to medical history, myopia was the most common prior diagnosis among those evaluated, while a low percentage of patients reported a history of retinal detachment in the contralateral eye (Table 1).
Regarding symptoms, decreased vision was the most frequently reported symptom (95.2%), followed by floaters (65.4%) and photopsias (41.8%). On physical examination the presence of tobacco dust in the vitreous humor was the most prevalent finding, reported in 89.4% of patients. Vitreous hemorrhage was identified in 6.3% of the cohort. In most patients (95.2%), the primary retinal break was identified (Table 1)
| Background | Positive (%) | Negative (%) |
| Trauma | 20 (9.6) | 188 (90.4) |
| Myopia | 160 (76.9) | 48 (23.1) |
| Fellow-eye RRD | 10 (4.8) | 198 (95.2) |
| Reported symptoms | ||
| Floaters | 136 (65.4) | 72 (34.6) |
| Photopsias | 87 (41.8) | 121 (58.2) |
| Decreased vision | 198 (95.2) | 10 (4.8) |
| Findings from ophthalmological examination | ||
| Tobacco Dust Sign | 186 (89.4) | 22 (10.6) |
| Vitreous hemorrhage | 13 (6.3) | 195 (93.8) |
| Primary retinal Break identified | 198 (95.2) | 10 (4.8) |
| Most frequent primary retinal break | ||
| Horseshoe tear | 107 (51.4) | |
| Lattice Degeneration | 70 (33.7) | |
| Capped hole | 10 (4.8) | |
| Macular hole | 7 (3.4) | |
| Retinal dialysis | 4 (1.9) | |
| Retinal Pathological Findings | ||
| Macular involvement | 177 (85.1) | 30 (14.4) |
| Fixed retinal folds | 65 (31.3) | 143 (68.8) |
| Intraretinal cysts | 16 (7.7) | 192 (92.3) |
| Subretinal bands | 1 (5.3) | 197 (94.7) |
Table 1: Clinical characteristics of patients with RRD at the time of the first assessment
3.3. Characteristics of primary retinal break
The most frequent primary retinal break was a horseshoe tear (51.4%), followed by lattice degeneration (33.7%). No tears met the criteria to be considered giant (extending 3 or more meridians). The location of the lesion on the retinal meridians and its extent are relevant characteristics for management and prognosis, and their distributions are detailed in Table 2. When classifying the meridians as superior (MX-MII) and inferior (MIII-MIX), it was observed that more than half of the horseshoe tears (71%, n = 76) and lattice degenerations (62.9%, n = 44) were located on the superior meridians. In contrast, operculated holes (80%, n = 8) and all retinal dialysis lesions (n = 4) were predominantly located on the inferior meridians. Regarding the extent of the lesion, Lattice degeneration showed the greatest average extent, while operculated holes showed the least extent.
The association between a history of trauma and the type of lesion was analyzed. Although only 9.6% of the total population reported trauma, this history was significantly more prevalent in retinal dialysis (75% of cases) compared to operculated holes (20%) and horseshoe tears (8.4%). No macular holes were associated with trauma (Table 2). The difference in the distribution of this history among the lesion types was statistically significant (p = 0.001). On the other hand, myopia was a common history in more than half of the cases for all types of causative lesions; however, no significant differences were found in its prevalence among the different lesion types (p = 0.611).
| Lesion | Most Frequent Location (% of all lesions of that type) | Extent of the Causative Lesion (clock hours ± SD) | History of trauma | History of myopia |
Horsehoe tear (n = 107) | MXII (24.3%) | 0.91 ± 0.54 | 9 (8.4%) | 81 (75.7%) |
| MX (16.8%) | ||||
Lattice degeneration (n = 70) | MXI (30.0%) | 1.48 ± 0.73 | 2 (20.0%) | 9 (90.0%) |
| MX y MXII (12.9?ch) | ||||
Operculated hole (n = 10) | MIX (30.0%) | 0.60 ± 0.21 | 6 (8.6%) | 53 (75.7%) |
| MIV (30.0%) | ||||
| Macular hole (n = 7) | Macula (100%) | - | 0 | 6 (85.7%) |
| Retinal dialysis (n = 4) | MV (50.0%) | 1.25 ± 0.50 | 3 (75.0%) | 2 (50.0%) |
Table 2: Characteristic of primary retinal brea
3.4. Macular involvement and its association with clinical variables
Given that macular involvement is a key prognostic factor for visual outcome, the study population was stratified into two groups: macula-on and macula off. Comparison of various clinical variables between these groups (Table 3) revealed significant differences in:
1. Visual acuity: Patients macula-on had an average visual acuity of 20/83, while those with macula-off averaged counting fingers at 1 meter (equivalent to 20/2143 on the Snellen scale).
2. Floaters: These were reported more frequently in the group macula-on (83.3%) compared to the group with macula-off (62.4%).
3. Reported visual impairment: This was significantly more prevalent in the group with macula-off (98.9%) than in the group macula-on (73.3%).
4. Fixed retinal folds: These were observed more frequently in the group with macula-off (34.3%) than in the group macula-on (13.3%). Additionally, a significant difference was found in the presence of mobile folds (p=0.029), with a higher frequency in the group with macula-off (48.9%) than in the group macula-on (26.7%).
5. Extent of RRD: The average extent of the detachment was significantly greater in the group with macula-off (6.82 ± 2.25 meridians) compared to the group macula-on (4.53 ± 2.00 meridians).
No statistically significant differences were found for the other variables compared, including the duration of the condition (p=0.720) and the findings associated with Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).
Macula-off (n = 178) | Macula-on (n = 30) | P Value | |
| Visual acuity logMAR (Snellen) | 2.03 ± 0.68 (20/2143) | 0.61 ± 0.52 (20/83) | <0> |
| Age (years) | 53.45 ± 14.54 | 54.80 ± 15.49 | 0.475a |
| Symptom duration (days) | 29.10 ± 40.20 | 33.43 ± 48.73 | 0.720a |
| Floaters | 111 (62.4%) | 25 (83.3%) | 0.036b |
| Photopsias | 76 (42.7%) | 11 (36.7%) | 0.690b |
| Decreased vision | 176 (98.9%) | 22 (73.3%) | <0> |
| History of trauma | 15 (8.4%) | 5 (16.7%) | 0.178b |
| Pre-existing refractive error | 134 (75.3%) | 26 (86.7%) | 0.241b |
| History of fellow-eye RRD | 8 (4.5%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0.640b |
| Tobacco dust | 162 (91.0%) | 24 (80.0%) | 0.101b |
| Vitreous Hemorrhage | 12 (6.7%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0.698b |
| Primary Retinal break identified | 168 (94.3%) | 30 (100%) | 0.372b |
| Horseshoe tear | 90 (52.9%) | 17 (56.7%) | 0.764b |
| Lattice degeneration | 59 (34.7%) | 11 (36.7%) | |
| Operculated hole | 8 (4.7%) | 2 (6.7%) | |
| Macular hole | 7 (4.1%) | 0 | |
| Retinal dialysis | 4 (2.4%) | 0 | |
| RRD extent (clock hours) | 6.82 ± 2.25 | 4.53 ± 2.00 | <0> |
| Fixed retinal folds | 61 (34.3%) | 4 (13.3%) | 0.031b |
| Intraretinal cyst | 13 (7.3%) | 3 (10.0%) | 0.708b |
| Subretinal strand | 10 (5.6%) | 1 (3.3%) | 1.000b |
a Mann-Whitney U test b χ² test | |||
Table 3: Comparative analysis of clinical characteristics
3.5 Association between symptom duration and fundus findings
Considering the role of symptom duration in the development of PVR, the association between this variable and the different fundus findings was evaluated (Table 4). Significant differences in symptom duration were observed for the PVR criteria (fixed folds and subretinal band) and for intraretinal cysts (indicators of chronicity); in all these cases, symptom duration was longer in the group presenting the finding. In contrast, the presence of Grade B PVR (mobile folds) was associated with a shorter symptom duration.
| Mean days of evolution | P Value (Mann-Whitney U test) | ||
| Present (n) | Absent (n) | ||
| Mobile folds | 18.44 ± 27.73 (95) | 39.21 ± 48.26 (113) | 0.001 |
| Fixed folds | 56.41 ± 52.34 (65) | 17.59 ± 28.18 (143) | < 0> |
| Intraretinal cyst | 77.00 ± 61.62 (16) | 25.78 ± 36.87 (192) | < 0> |
| Subretinal strand | 47.54 ± 48.12 (11) | 28.73 ± 40.94 (197) | 0.040 |
Table 4. Evolution-dependent differences in proliferative vitreoretinopathy findings
3.6 Correlation analyses
Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to explore the influence of RRD extension and symptom duration on visual capacity (LogMAR) (Table 5). A positive, moderate, and statistically significant correlation was identified between RRD extension (in meridians) and visual capacity (LogMAR), indicating that a greater extent of retinal detachment is associated with worse visual acuity. No significant correlation was found between symptom duration and visual capacity (LogMAR).
| P Value | Correlation Coefficient (ρ) | |
| Symptom onset time | 0.866 | - |
| Extent of RRD (Clock hours) | <0> | 0.395 |
Table 5: Factors Influencing Initial Visual Acuity
Characterizing the demographic and clinical features of DRR is fundamental to understanding its epidemiology and guiding management strategies. This study explored these variables in an adult Mexican population treated at a tertiary care center, seeking to identify significant differences and associations, as well as compare these findings with those reported in the international literature. In accordance with previous epidemiological studies, [18,19] diverse findings from our cohort showed patterns consistent with those described by other authors, which supports the central hypothesis of this work. The following similarities are detailed below:
a. Mean age: The mean age of our patients (53.6 ± 14.6 years) was similar to that reported in a recent multicenter study conducted in the United States (57.9 ± 12.4 years).[20] European studies have documented comparable age ranges, although regional variations are observed, such as the mean age of 47.8 years in Taiwan,[21] which underscores the demographic diversity of the populations studied.
b. Male predominance: Males were more affected in our cohort (55.77% men vs. 44.23% women), a finding consistent with reports from European studies (e.g., male-to-female ratio of 2.1:1[22]; Asians [6,21]; and Americans [14,23]).
c. Ocular laterality: The right eye showed a higher prevalence of involvement, which is consistent with reports in the international literature, which indicates right eye involvement in 52–63% of cases.[18,22,19] A recent multicenter analysis not only confirmed this predominance but also identified that the DRR phenotype can vary with laterality, with a higher frequency of foveal detachment and larger retinal tears in cases of right eye involvement.[24]
d. History of ocular trauma: The prevalence of a history of ocular trauma in our cohort (9.6%) was like that of the Scottish study (10.3%),[18] suggesting consistency in this etiological factor across populations. However, other studies have reported higher prevalences, reaching 34%,[25] which could reflect demographic variations, exposure to occupational hazards, or differences in access to ophthalmological care. Trauma, particularly of a blunt nature, can induce the formation of retinal lesions that predispose to detachment.
e. Most frequent primary retinal break: Horseshoe tears were the most frequent causative lesion in this study (51.4%), a finding consistent with the global epidemiology of retinal degeneration in adults, where percentages between 50% and 80% are reported. This high prevalence is explained by the pathophysiology of this lesion: a horseshoe tear involves active vitreous traction and a larger area of exposure of the underlying retinal pigment epithelium, which facilitates the entry of vitreous into the subretinal space. In contrast, in an operculated hole, vitreous traction has ceased, and the area of exposure is smaller. Although lattice degeneration also presents vitreous traction, it does not always provide a direct entry pathway for subretinal fluid, unlike a frank tear. It is important to note that although lattice degeneration is the most common predisposing lesion in the general population (6-14.5%)[19,26] most of these lesions never progress to a RRD.
f. Location of lesions: The predominant location of lesions in the superior meridians was a finding consistent with the literature, which describes the superotemporal quadrant as the most frequently affected (up to 69% of cases), and the inferonasal as the least common (17%).[27] This is attributed to the gravitational effect, which facilitates the movement of subretinal fluid once it has entered space. Although inferior lesions are associated with a lower risk of detachment, they carry a higher risk of multiple lesions and recurrence after surgery.[28]
g. Vitreous hemorrhage: The percentage of patients who presented with vitreous hemorrhage in our study was 6.3%, comparable to the 7.5-10% reported in European studies [18]
Furthermore, differences and factors associated with chronicity and severity were also identified. The prevalence of grade C PVR was significantly higher in our cohort (31.3%) compared to the European study (11.7%).[18] This figure is higher than the consistent prevalence of 5–10% reported in larger epidemiological studies,[29] although some studies have documented higher figures, up to 26.9%.[30]
Another important difference lies in the percentage of patients with macular involvement at presentation: 85.1% in our study versus 49.4% in the study by Mitry et al. [18] Considering the similarity in the location and characteristics of the predisposing lesions, this disparity in chronicity indicators (PVR and MI) and other findings such as intraretinal cysts suggests a greater delay in seeking medical attention after the onset of symptoms in our population. The average duration of symptoms in our study was 33.43 days, considerably longer than the 8.5 days reported in other cohorts.[31] This difference in duration likely allowed subretinal fluid to progress to involve the macula in a greater number of cases and contributes to the development of C-RVR. Evidence has shown that progression time is a risk factor for macular detachment, especially in RRD with a bullous configuration.[32] Consistently, in the present study, eyes with macula-off RRD showed a greater average extent (6.82 ± 2.25 meridians vs. 4.53 ± 2.00 meridians in the group of macula-on), and a greater RRD extent was found to be associated with worse visual acuity.
Regarding the presenting symptoms of RRD, decreased vision was the most frequent symptom, followed by floaters and photopsias. When stratified by macular status, floaters were more common in the group with macula-on while decreased visual acuity predominated in the group macula-off. This pattern aligns with previous reports,[33] as peripheral visual loss without macular involvement may be less noticeable to the patient. Although not evaluated in this study, curtain visual field loss is a highly specific symptom of RRD,[31] and its targeted investigation is crucial.
The mean visual acuity of the population at admission was LogMAR 1.83 (equivalent to counting fingers at 2 meters or 20/1352 Snellen). Division by macular status revealed considerably better preoperative vision in patients with an attached macula (LogMAR 0.61 or 20/83) compared to those with a detached macula (LogMAR 2.03 or counting fingers at 1 meter), a finding consistent with other studies (e.g., LogMAR 1.98 in DRRs with MI in a prospective UK cohort study).[34] Preoperative vision is recognized as one of the main biomarkers of postoperative visual outcome, where better baseline vision is associated with better results.[34]
4.1 Limitations
This study has certain limitations inherent to its design and the nature of data collection. First, as it is a retrospective study, the reliability of the findings is directly dependent on the quality and completeness of the clinical records. This means that the available information relies on the original documentation, which can lead to incomplete or missing data for variables of interest. In this regard, several relevant background and clinical data points for the complete characterization of DRR were not consistently documented in the records for this study. Among these variables highlight the presence or absence of complete posterior vitreous detachment, the exact number of causative lesions, and a family history of retinal detachment. It would also be interesting to document the average time it takes to operate on the patient after diagnosis. This lack of detailed information not only affected the depth of the analysis but also hinders a comprehensive comparison with previous studies[5] and opens the opportunity for future prospective research of this type to explicitly include these variables in its data collection protocol.
In addition, the research was based on patients treated at a single tertiary care center. While this ensures specialized expertise, it introduces the possibility of selection bias, as the study population may not be entirely representative of the general Mexican population; patients arriving at a tertiary care center often present with more complex cases or are referred late, which could influence the characteristics of the cohort.
As this was a cross-sectional and retrospective characterization study, it was not possible to establish causal relationships between the observed variables, only associations. Furthermore, the lack of long-term follow-up data at this stage of the study prevents direct evaluation of visual prognosis or the re-detachment rate based on initial clinical characteristics.
The results demonstrate consistency in several fundamental characteristics of RRD with those reported in epidemiological studies in other populations.[5] This study also revealed significant differences that warrant attention, such as the average age. In our population, a higher prevalence of indicators of chronicity and severity was found, such as post-refractive error of vision, fixed folds and intraretinal cysts. These differences, especially the greater extent of RRD and the poorer visual acuity in patients with PVR, suggest that a proportion of patients at this referral center may be seeking medical care with more advanced or longer-standing RRD. This could reflect inherent challenges within the healthcare system, such as barriers to access, delays in diagnosis, or timely referral, which directly impact prognosis.
This study provides a solid foundation for future research that complements the data obtained. Longitudinal studies would be valuable to evaluate long-term visual prognosis and the rate of re-detachment, as well as to investigate in depth the socioeconomic factors and access to healthcare that may influence the duration of the disease and its severity at presentation in the Mexican population. Finally, this work underlines the importance of timely detection and referral of RRD to mitigate the impact of chronicity factors and improve visual outcomes.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. The peer review process of the journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions was excellent and fast, as was the support of the editorial office and the quality of the journal. Kind regards Walter F. Riesen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Walter F. Riesen.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. Thank you for publishing our article, Exploring Clozapine's Efficacy in Managing Aggression: A Multiple Single-Case Study in Forensic Psychiatry in the international journal of clinical case reports and reviews. We found the peer review process very professional and efficient. The comments were constructive, and the whole process was efficient. On behalf of the co-authors, I would like to thank you for publishing this article. With regards, Dr. Jelle R. Lettinga.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, I would like to express my deep admiration for the exceptional professionalism demonstrated by your journal. I am thoroughly impressed by the speed of the editorial process, the substantive and insightful reviews, and the meticulous preparation of the manuscript for publication. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the courteous and immediate responses from your editorial office to all my inquiries. Best Regards, Dariusz Ziora
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation, Auctores Publishing LLC, We would like to thank the editorial team for the smooth and high-quality communication leading up to the publication of our article in the Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. The reviewers have extensive knowledge in the field, and their relevant questions helped to add value to our publication. Kind regards, Dr. Ravi Shrivastava.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, Auctores Publishing LLC, USA Office: +1-(302)-520-2644. I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the efficient and professional handling of my case report by the ‘Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies’. The peer review process was not only fast but also highly constructive—the reviewers’ comments were clear, relevant, and greatly helped me improve the quality and clarity of my manuscript. I also received excellent support from the editorial office throughout the process. Communication was smooth and timely, and I felt well guided at every stage, from submission to publication. The overall quality and rigor of the journal are truly commendable. I am pleased to have published my work with Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, and I look forward to future opportunities for collaboration. Sincerely, Aline Tollet, UCLouvain.
Dear Ms. Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. “The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews represented the “ideal house” to share with the research community a first experience with the use of the Simeox device for speech rehabilitation. High scientific reputation and attractive website communication were first determinants for the selection of this Journal, and the following submission process exceeded expectations: fast but highly professional peer review, great support by the editorial office, elegant graphic layout. Exactly what a dynamic research team - also composed by allied professionals - needs!" From, Chiara Beccaluva, PT - Italy.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, we have deeply appreciated the professionalism demonstrated by the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The reviewers have extensive knowledge of our field and have been very efficient and fast in supporting the process. I am really looking forward to further collaboration. Thanks. Best regards, Dr. Claudio Ligresti
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. “The peer review process was efficient and constructive, and the editorial office provided excellent communication and support throughout. The journal ensures scientific rigor and high editorial standards, while also offering a smooth and timely publication process. We sincerely appreciate the work of the editorial team in facilitating the dissemination of innovative approaches such as the Bonori Method.” Best regards, Dr. Matteo Bonori.
I recommend without hesitation submitting relevant papers on medical decision making to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I am very grateful to the editorial staff. Maria Emerson was a pleasure to communicate with. The time from submission to publication was an extremely short 3 weeks. The editorial staff submitted the paper to three reviewers. Two of the reviewers commented positively on the value of publishing the paper. The editorial staff quickly recognized the third reviewer’s comments as an unjust attempt to reject the paper. I revised the paper as recommended by the first two reviewers.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Thank you for publishing our case report: "Clinical Case of Effective Fetal Stem Cells Treatment in a Patient with Autism Spectrum Disorder" within the "Journal of Clinical Research and Reports" being submitted by the team of EmCell doctors from Kyiv, Ukraine. We much appreciate a professional and transparent peer-review process from Auctores. All research Doctors are so grateful to your Editorial Office and Auctores Publishing support! I amiably wish our article publication maintained a top quality of your International Scientific Journal. My best wishes for a prosperity of the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Hope our scientific relationship and cooperation will remain long lasting. Thank you very much indeed. Kind regards, Dr. Andriy Sinelnyk Cell Therapy Center EmCell
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. It was truly a rewarding experience to work with the journal “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. The peer review process was insightful and encouraging, helping us refine our work to a higher standard. The editorial office offered exceptional support with prompt and thoughtful communication. I highly value the journal’s role in promoting scientific advancement and am honored to be part of it. Best regards, Meng-Jou Lee, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital.
Dear Editorial Team, Journal-Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, “Publishing my article with Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions has been a highly positive experience. The peer-review process was rigorous yet supportive, offering valuable feedback that strengthened my work. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional professionalism, prompt communication, and a genuine commitment to maintaining the highest scientific standards. I am very pleased with the publication quality and proud to be associated with such a reputable journal.” Warm regards, Dr. Mahmoud Kamal Moustafa Ahmed
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews’, I appreciate the opportunity to publish my article with your journal. The editorial office provided clear communication during the submission and review process, and I found the overall experience professional and constructive. Best regards, Elena Salvatore.
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews Herewith I confirm an optimal peer review process and a great support of the editorial office of the present journal
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. I am really grateful for the peers review; their feedback gave me the opportunity to reflect on the message and impact of my work and to ameliorate the article. The editors did a great job in addition by encouraging me to continue with the process of publishing.
Dear Cecilia Lilly, Editorial Coordinator, Endocrinology and Disorders, Thank you so much for your quick response regarding reviewing and all process till publishing our manuscript entitled: Prevalence of Pre-Diabetes and its Associated Risk Factors Among Nile College Students, Sudan. Best regards, Dr Mamoun Magzoub.
