AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/254
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Abia State University Teaching Hospital, Aba, Nigeria.
2Department of Biochemistry, Lead City University, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Emmanuel M. Akwuruoha, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Abia State University Teaching Hospital, Aba, Nigeria.
Citation: Emmanuel M. Akwuruoha, Augustine I. Airaodion, (2025), Assessment of Knowledge, Perception, and Risk Factors of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome among Women in Nigeria, J. Women Health Care and Issues, 8(5); DOI:10.31579/2642-9756/254
Copyright: © 2025, Emmanuel M. Akwuruoha. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 24 November 2025 | Accepted: 03 December 2025 | Published: 10 December 2025
Keywords: polycystic ovary syndrome; knowledge; perception, risk factors; women; Nigeria; reproductive health
Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most prevalent endocrine and reproductive disorders affecting women of reproductive age. Despite its high burden, awareness and understanding of PCOS remain low in many low- and middle-income countries, including Nigeria. This study assessed the knowledge, perception, and risk factors of PCOS among women attending Abia State University Teaching Hospital (ABSUTH), Aba, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods: A hospital-based descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 250 women of reproductive age (15–49 years) attending outpatient clinics at ABSUTH. Participants were selected using systematic random sampling. Data were collected through a structured, pretested, interviewer-administered questionnaire covering socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge, perception, risk factors, and health-seeking behaviors related to PCOS. Reliability was established with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.81. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Descriptive statistics summarized the data, chi-square tests assessed associations, and logistic regression identified predictors of knowledge and perception. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: The mean age of respondents was 31.8 ± 7.5 years, with most being married (64.4%) and having a tertiary education (60.4%). Awareness of PCOS was relatively low, with 54.8% identifying irregular menstrual cycles and 50.4% recognizing obesity as symptom. Only 39.2% linked PCOS with infertility. Perception analysis showed 55.2% agreed that PCOS is a serious reproductive health issue, while 60.8% believed it negatively impacts self-esteem and quality of life. Family history of PCOS was reported by 13.6%, while 38.4% reported family history of diabetes, obesity, or infertility. More than half (56.8%) identified weight management and exercise as helpful interventions, though only 22.8% had ever been screened for PCOS. Knowledge score showed significant positive correlations with perception (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), education (r = 0.41, p < 0.001), and willingness to undergo screening (r = 0.38, p < 0.001). Higher educational attainment was significantly associated with awareness (χ² = 28.54, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The study revealed limited knowledge but relatively positive perceptions of PCOS among women in Aba, Nigeria. Education level emerged as a strong predictor of awareness and willingness to screen. Public health interventions focusing on awareness creation, early screening, and lifestyle modification are needed to improve PCOS prevention and management.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous endocrine disorder affecting reproductive-aged women worldwide and is characterized by a variable combination of menstrual irregularity, hyperandrogenism (clinical or biochemical), and polycystic ovarian morphology on ultrasound. Diagnostic frameworks developed over the past two decades — most notably the Rotterdam consensus and subsequent refinements emphasizing androgen excess — reflect the clinical and phenotypic breadth of PCOS and the ongoing debate about its definition. These diagnostic criteria matter for epidemiology and for comparing prevalence estimates between populations because different criteria capture different phenotypes and severities of the condition [1,2].
PCOS is clinically important not only because it is one of the leading identifiable causes of anovulatory infertility, but also because it is associated with long-term metabolic and psychological comorbidities. Insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinaemia are central to many pathophysiologic models and explain the close links between PCOS and obesity, dysglycaemia, adverse lipid profiles, and increased cardiometabolic risk. In parallel, hyperandrogenism accounts for cutaneous and reproductive features (e.g., hirsutism, acne, oligo-/amenorrhoea) that drive health-seeking behaviour and quality-of-life impacts. Contemporary clinical reviews emphasise that the syndrome is lifelong and multidisciplinary in implication, requiring attention to reproduction, cardiometabolic health, and mental well-being [3,4].
Estimates of PCOS prevalence vary considerably across settings because of differences in diagnostic criteria, sampling frames, and study methods. Global population and clinic-based estimates reported in recent syntheses place prevalence broadly between about 2% and 26%, with many unselected population studies clustering in the range of ~6–12
Study Design
A hospital-based descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed. This design was considered appropriate because it allowed for the systematic collection of data on the knowledge, perception, and risk factors of polycystic ovary syndrome among women attending the hospital during the study period [12].
Study Area
The study was conducted at the Abia State University Teaching Hospital (ABSUTH), Aba, Abia State, Nigeria. The hospital is a tertiary healthcare institution that serves as a major referral centre for both rural and urban populations in Abia State and its neighbouring states [13]. It provides specialized services in obstetrics and gynaecology, internal medicine, paediatrics, and surgery, making it an ideal setting for a study focusing on reproductive health conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
Study Population
The target population comprised women of reproductive age (15–49 years) who attended outpatient clinics at ABSUTH during the study period. These included women visiting the gynaecology, antenatal, family planning, and general outpatient clinics.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Sample Size Determination
The sample size was determined using Cochran's formula for estimating population proportions, as outlined by Akwuruoha et al. [14]:
n = 
The formula components are defined as follows:
q = 1 - p
A recent study conducted by Ugwu et al. [15] reported the prevalence of PCOS in Southeast Nigeria as 18.1%
P = 18.1% = 0.181
q = 1 – 0.181
= 0.819
n = 
n = 
n = 
= 227.79
The minimum sample size was 228, but it was adjusted to 250 to account for a 10% non-response rate.
Sampling Technique
A systematic random sampling technique was used. Using the ANC attendance register, the sampling interval was determined by dividing the estimated number of eligible pregnant women attending ANC during the study period by the required sample size [11]. The first participant was selected randomly, and every 5th eligible woman was subsequently recruited until the sample size was attained.
Data Collection Instrument
Data were collected using a structured, pretested, interviewer-administered questionnaire. The instrument was developed after an extensive review of existing literature on knowledge, perception, and risk factors of PCOS. It was divided into five sections:
The questionnaire included both closed- and open-ended questions and was translated into the local Igbo language for participants who could not communicate fluently in English.
Validity and Reliability of the Instrument
The questionnaire was reviewed by experts in reproductive health and epidemiology to ensure content validity. A pilot test was conducted among 20 women attending the General Hospital, Aba, to assess clarity, cultural appropriateness, and reliability. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s alpha, with a coefficient of 0.81 obtained, indicating high reliability.
Data Collection Procedure
Trained research assistants, who were nurses and final-year medical students familiar with the subject matter, administered the questionnaires. Before data collection, participants were informed about the study's objectives and assured of confidentiality. Written informed consent was obtained. Interviews lasted an average of 20–25 minutes.
Data Management and Analysis
Completed questionnaires were checked daily for completeness and consistency. Data were coded and entered into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 for analysis.
Ethical Considerations
Permission was also obtained from the hospital management. Informed consent was obtained from each participant before inclusion. Anonymity and confidentiality of the respondents’ information were strictly maintained, and participants were assured that their responses would be used solely for research purposes. Participation was entirely voluntary, and participants could withdraw at any stage without penalty.
The study involved 250 participants, with the majority of respondents aged 25–34 years (36.8%) and 35–44 years (28.4%). The majority were married (64.4%), had tertiary education (60.4%), were formally employed (48.4%), resided in urban areas (62.8%), and were multiparous (42.4%) (Table 1).
Knowledge of PCOS was moderate. The most commonly identified symptoms included irregular menstrual cycle (54.8%), weight gain/obesity (50.4%), and hirsutism (38.4%). Only 19.6% recognized infertility as a symptom. Regarding associated risks, more than half linked PCOS with diabetes (56.8%), while fewer associated it with hypertension (25.6%) and cardiovascular diseases (14.8%). Likert-scale statements revealed strong agreement that PCOS is a hormonal disorder (78.4%), can affect fertility (72.8%), and may be managed with lifestyle and medical treatment (55.2%) (Tables 2a and 2b).
Perceptions showed that respondents acknowledged PCOS as a serious reproductive health issue (55.2%), with 60.8% agreeing that it negatively impacts self-esteem and quality of life. However, only 33.6% strongly perceived that awareness is generally low. Most participants (72%) agreed that early diagnosis prevents complications, and 60.8% supported health education interventions in hospitals and communities (Table 3).
Risk factors highlighted included family history of diabetes, obesity, or infertility (38.4%), sedentary lifestyle, and poor dietary habits, with nearly half reporting no regular physical activity (49.6%). While smoking was uncommon (4.8%), alcohol consumption was reported by 27.2%. Likert-scale responses confirmed that obesity (66%) and poor dietary habits (54.4%) were perceived as major risk factors (Tables 4a and 4b).
Health-seeking behavior revealed that only 22.8% had ever been screened for PCOS, predominantly in public hospitals (13.6%). Nevertheless, willingness to undergo routine screening was high (83.2%). Weight management and exercise (56.8%), dietary modification (47.2%), and medications (38.4%) were the most frequently endorsed preventive interventions, while herbal remedies were less cited (19.6%) (Table 5).
Correlation analyses showed a strong positive association between knowledge and perception (r = 0.62, p < 0 xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed>
Chi-square analyses confirmed that higher education was significantly associated with PCOS awareness (χ² = 28.54, p < 0 xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed>Variable Category Frequency (n = 250) Percentage (%) Age 15–24 years 49 19.60 25–34 years 92 36.80 35–44 years 71 28.40 45–49 years 38 15.20 Total 250 100.00 Marital Status Single 57 22.80 Married 161 64.40 Divorced 9 3.60 Widowed 3 1.20 Cohabiting 20 8.00 Total 250 100.00 Educational Level No formal education 5 2.00 Primary education 26 10.40 Secondary education 68 27.20 Tertiary education 151 60.40 Total 250 100.00 Occupation Employed (formal) 121 48.40 Unemployed 49 19.60 Student 26 10.40 Self-employed 45 18.00 Homemaker 9 3.60 Total 250 100.00 Residence Urban 157 62.80 Rural 93 37.20 Total 250 100.00 Parity Nulliparous 78 31.20 Primiparous 66 26.40 Multiparous 106 42.40 Total 250 100.00
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics
| Variable | Frequency | Percentage (n = 250) |
| Which of the following are common symptoms of PCOS? (multiple responses) | ||
| Irregular menstrual cycle | 137 | 54.80% |
| Excess hair growth (hirsutism) | 96 | 38.40% |
| Weight gain / obesity | 126 | 50.40% |
| Acne / oily skin | 88 | 35.20% |
| Infertility | 49 | 19.60% |
| Hair loss / thinning scalp | 34 | 13.60% |
| Don’t know | 18 | 7.20% |
| PCOS is associated with increased risk of: (multiple responses) | ||
| Diabetes | 142 | 56.80% |
| Hypertension | 64 | 25.60% |
| Cardiovascular diseases | 37 | 14.80% |
| Infertility | 98 | 39.20% |
| Don’t know | 26 | 10.40% |
Table 2a: Knowledge of PCOS
| Statement | 1 (SD) | 2 (D) | 3 (N) | 4 (A) | 5 (SA) |
| PCOS is a hormonal disorder that affects women of reproductive age. | 8 (3.20%) | 12 (4.80%) | 34 (13.60%) | 96 (38.40%) | 100 (40.00%) |
| PCOS can be diagnosed by ultrasound and blood tests. | 12 (4.80%) | 28 (11.20%) | 46 (18.40%) | 92 (36.80%) | 72 (28.80%) |
| PCOS can affect a woman’s ability to conceive. | 6 (2.40%) | 18 (7.20%) | 44 (17.60%) | 110 (44.00%) | 72 (28.80%) |
| Being overweight or obese increases the risk of PCOS. | 10 (4.00%) | 32 (12.80%) | 58 (23.20%) | 96 (38.40%) | 54 (21.60%) |
| PCOS can be managed with lifestyle modification and medical treatment | 14 (5.60%) | 36 (14.40%) | 62 (24.80%) | 90 (36.00%) | 48 (19.20%) |
Table 2b: Knowledge Statements
1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 5 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree
| Statement | 1 (SD) | 2 (D) | 3 (N) | 4 (A) | 5 (SA) |
| PCOS is a serious reproductive health problem among Nigerian women. | 18 (7.20%) | 36 (14.40%) | 58 (23.20%) | 90 (36.00%) | 48 (19.20%) |
| Women with PCOS face social stigma and discrimination. | 24 (9.60%) | 46 (18.40%) | 72 (28.80%) | 78 (31.20%) | 30 (12.00%) |
| PCOS hurts a woman’s self-esteem and quality of life. | 12 (4.80%) | 22 (8.80%) | 64 (25.60%) | 104 (41.60%) | 48 (19.20%) |
| Awareness of PCOS is generally low among women in Nigeria. | 26 (10.40%) | 58 (23.20%) | 84 (33.60%) | 58 (23.20%) | 24 (9.60%) |
| Early diagnosis and management can prevent complications. | 10 (4.00%) | 20 (8.00%) | 40 (16.00%) | 120 (48.00%) | 60 (24.00%) |
| Health education on PCOS should be available in hospitals & communities. | 14 (5.60%) | 28 (11.20%) | 56 (22.40%) | 92 (36.80%) | 60 (24.00%) |
Table 3: Perception of PCOS
| Variable | Category | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
| Family history of PCOS | Yes | 34 | 13.60 |
| No | 176 | 70.40 | |
| Don’t know | 40 | 16.00 | |
| Family history of diabetes, obesity, or infertility | Yes | 96 | 38.40 |
| No | 154 | 61.60 | |
| Regular physical activity/exercise | Yes | 126 | 50.40 |
| No | 124 | 49.60 | |
| Dietary pattern | High carbohydrate diet | 64 | 25.60 |
| High fat diet | 49 | 19.60 | |
| Balanced diet | 96 | 38.40 | |
| Irregular / fast-food based | 41 | 16.40 | |
| Smoking | Yes | 12 | 4.80 |
| No | 238 | 95.20 | |
| Alcohol consumption | Yes | 68 | 27.20 |
| No | 182 | 72.80 |
Table 4a: Risk Factors and Behaviours
| Statement | 1 (SD) | 2 (D) | 3 (N) | 4 (A) | 5 (SA) |
| Obesity is a major risk factor for PCOS. | 12 (4.80%) | 26 (10.40%) | 48 (19.20%) | 104 (41.60%) | 60 (24.00%) |
| Family history predisposes to PCOS. | 18 (7.20%) | 34 (13.60%) | 60 (24.00%) | 96 (38.40%) | 42 (16.80%) |
| Stress and a sedentary lifestyle contribute to PCOS. | 10 (4.00%) | 28 (11.20%) | 86 (34.40%) | 88 (35.20%) | 38 (15.20%) |
| Poor dietary habits increase the risk of PCOS. | 14 (5.60%) | 36 (14.40%) | 64 (25.60%) | 92 (36.80%) | 44 (17.60%) |
| PCOS can occur in all weight categories | 20 (8.00%) | 30 (12.00%) | 72 (28.80%) | 86 (34.40%) | 42 (16.80%) |
Table 4b: Risk factor statements
| Variable | Category | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
| Have you ever been screened for PCOS? | Yes | 57 | 22.8 |
| No | 193 | 77.2 | |
| If screened, where? | Public hospital | 34 | 13.6 |
| Private hospital | 19 | 7.6 | |
| Other | 4 | 1.6 | |
| Willingness to undergo routine screening | Yes | 208 | 83.2 |
| No | 42 | 16.8 | |
| Interventions believed helpful (multiple responses allowed) | Weight management and exercise | 142 | 56.8 |
| Medications prescribed by a doctor | 96 | 38.4 | |
| Dietary modification | 118 | 47.2 | |
| Herbal / traditional remedies | 49 | 19.6 |
Table 5: Health-seeking Behaviour and Preventive Practices
| Knowledge_score | Perception_score | Riskfactor_score | Age_group_numeric | Education_level_numeric | Willing_to_screen | |
| Knowledge_score | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.45 | -0.12 | 0.41 | 0.38 |
| Perception_score | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.34 | -0.08 | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| Riskfactor_score | 0.45 | 0.34 | 1.00 | 0.15 | -0.09 | 0.21 |
| Age_group_numeric | -0.12 | -0.08 | 0.15 | 1.00 | -0.22 | -0.05 |
| Education_level_numeric | 0.41 | 0.29 | -0.09 | -0.22 | 1.00 | 0.27 |
| Willing_to_screen | 0.38 | 0.31 | 0.21 | -0.05 | 0.27 | 1.00 |
Table 6a: Correlation coefficients ®
| Knowledge_score | Perception_score | Riskfactor_score | Age_group_numeric | Education_level_numeric | Willing_to_screen | |
| Knowledge_score | <0> | <0> | <0> | 0.056 | <0> | <0> |
| Perception_score | <0> | <0> | <0> | 0.180 | <0> | <0> |
| Riskfactor_score | <0> | <0> | <0> | 0.018 | 0.130 | 0.001 |
| Age_group_numeric | 0.056 | 0.180 | 0.018 | <0> | <0> | 0.370 |
| Education_level_numeric | <0> | <0> | 0.130 | <0> | <0> | <0> |
| Willing_to_screen | <0> | <0> | 0.001 | 0.370 | <0> | <0> |
Table 6b: Corresponding p-values
| Comparison (variables) | χ² (Chi-square) | df | p-value |
| Heard of PCOS vs educational level | 28.54 | 4 | <0> |
| Heard of PCOS vs Age group | 12.87 | 3 | 0.005* |
| Screened for PCOS vs Marital status | 6.32 | 3 | 0.098 |
| Willing to undergo routine screening vs educational level | 16.45 | 4 | 0.003* |
| Family history of PCOS vs Ever screened | 9.21 | 2 | 0.010* |
Values are significant at p<0>
Table 7: Chi-square Analyses
This study assessed the knowledge, perception, and risk-factor awareness of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) among 250 women in Abia State, Nigeria, and explored associations with sociodemographic variables and health-seeking behaviours. The findings reveal both encouraging and concerning patterns when compared with the existing literature. In what follows, our discussion situates these results in relation to prior studies, highlights possible explanations, notes implications, and acknowledges limitations.
In the sociodemographic profile, the largest age group was 25–34 years (36.8%), followed by 35–44 years (28.4%), while only 15.2% were aged 45–49 years. This age distribution is broadly consistent with many reproductive health studies in Nigeria, which often sample women in their mid to late reproductive years. The high proportion (60.4%) of participants with tertiary education reflects a relatively educated sample—indeed, previous Nigerian studies such as Omagbemi et al. [16] have observed that women who participate in health surveys tend to be more educated than the general population. In this sample, 62.8% resided in urban areas, which may partly reflect greater recruitment access in urban centres and the likelihood that women in urban areas more readily engage with research activities.
Regarding knowledge of PCOS, while over half of respondents correctly identified “irregular menstrual cycle” (54.8%) and “weight gain/obesity” (50.4%) as common symptoms, lower proportions recognized hirsutism (38.4%), acne (35.2%), infertility (19.6%), and hair thinning (13.6%). Also, 7.2% selected “don’t know.” In terms of associated risks, 56.8% recognized the association with diabetes, 39.2% with infertility, but only 25.6% with hypertension and 14.8% with cardiovascular disease, while 10.4% did not know. On knowledge statements using the Likert scale, the majority agreed that PCOS is a hormonal disorder affecting reproductive-aged women, can be diagnosed by ultrasound and blood tests, affects fertility, is influenced by overweight/obesity, and can be managed by lifestyle modification and medical treatment.
These findings suggest a moderate level of symptom awareness, but substantial gaps in comprehensive knowledge—especially in relation to long-term health risks and less visible symptoms. Comparatively, a study in South-West Nigeria [16] reported that knowledge of PCOS among women was generally inadequate, with many unable to correctly identify hallmark features or complications. Similarly, Jaber et al. [17] in another cross-sectional investigation found that many women lacked correct knowledge about PCOS diagnosis and long-term sequelae. In contrast, in a study of nurses in Lebanon, Srour et al. [5] found relatively higher knowledge among a health-care provider group, reinforcing that professional exposure is likely a strong influencer of knowledge. The discrepancy between clinical populations or health professionals and community women underscores the need for targeted health education programs in the general female population.
In terms of perception, most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that PCOS is a serious reproductive health problem (55.2% when combining “Agree” and “Strongly Agree”), and a substantial proportion recognized negative psychosocial effects: 50.8% agreed that PCOS hurts self-esteem and quality of life, and 43.2
This study reveals that among women in Abia State, knowledge and risk-factor awareness of PCOS are moderate but with notable gaps, perception is generally favourable but still constrained by misinformation and stigma, and actual screening uptake is low despite expressed willingness. Education emerges as a key factor in enhancing awareness and encouraging preventive behaviour. To reduce the burden of undiagnosed PCOS and its complications in Nigeria, health education initiatives, accessible screening services, and stigma-reduction strategies are warranted. Future research should aim to include broader and more representative samples, and ideally incorporate clinical diagnostics to relate knowledge and perception to actual PCOS prevalence and outcomes.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. The peer review process of the journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions was excellent and fast, as was the support of the editorial office and the quality of the journal. Kind regards Walter F. Riesen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Walter F. Riesen.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. Thank you for publishing our article, Exploring Clozapine's Efficacy in Managing Aggression: A Multiple Single-Case Study in Forensic Psychiatry in the international journal of clinical case reports and reviews. We found the peer review process very professional and efficient. The comments were constructive, and the whole process was efficient. On behalf of the co-authors, I would like to thank you for publishing this article. With regards, Dr. Jelle R. Lettinga.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, I would like to express my deep admiration for the exceptional professionalism demonstrated by your journal. I am thoroughly impressed by the speed of the editorial process, the substantive and insightful reviews, and the meticulous preparation of the manuscript for publication. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the courteous and immediate responses from your editorial office to all my inquiries. Best Regards, Dariusz Ziora
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation, Auctores Publishing LLC, We would like to thank the editorial team for the smooth and high-quality communication leading up to the publication of our article in the Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. The reviewers have extensive knowledge in the field, and their relevant questions helped to add value to our publication. Kind regards, Dr. Ravi Shrivastava.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, Auctores Publishing LLC, USA Office: +1-(302)-520-2644. I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the efficient and professional handling of my case report by the ‘Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies’. The peer review process was not only fast but also highly constructive—the reviewers’ comments were clear, relevant, and greatly helped me improve the quality and clarity of my manuscript. I also received excellent support from the editorial office throughout the process. Communication was smooth and timely, and I felt well guided at every stage, from submission to publication. The overall quality and rigor of the journal are truly commendable. I am pleased to have published my work with Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, and I look forward to future opportunities for collaboration. Sincerely, Aline Tollet, UCLouvain.
Dear Ms. Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. “The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews represented the “ideal house” to share with the research community a first experience with the use of the Simeox device for speech rehabilitation. High scientific reputation and attractive website communication were first determinants for the selection of this Journal, and the following submission process exceeded expectations: fast but highly professional peer review, great support by the editorial office, elegant graphic layout. Exactly what a dynamic research team - also composed by allied professionals - needs!" From, Chiara Beccaluva, PT - Italy.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, we have deeply appreciated the professionalism demonstrated by the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The reviewers have extensive knowledge of our field and have been very efficient and fast in supporting the process. I am really looking forward to further collaboration. Thanks. Best regards, Dr. Claudio Ligresti
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. “The peer review process was efficient and constructive, and the editorial office provided excellent communication and support throughout. The journal ensures scientific rigor and high editorial standards, while also offering a smooth and timely publication process. We sincerely appreciate the work of the editorial team in facilitating the dissemination of innovative approaches such as the Bonori Method.” Best regards, Dr. Matteo Bonori.
I recommend without hesitation submitting relevant papers on medical decision making to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I am very grateful to the editorial staff. Maria Emerson was a pleasure to communicate with. The time from submission to publication was an extremely short 3 weeks. The editorial staff submitted the paper to three reviewers. Two of the reviewers commented positively on the value of publishing the paper. The editorial staff quickly recognized the third reviewer’s comments as an unjust attempt to reject the paper. I revised the paper as recommended by the first two reviewers.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Thank you for publishing our case report: "Clinical Case of Effective Fetal Stem Cells Treatment in a Patient with Autism Spectrum Disorder" within the "Journal of Clinical Research and Reports" being submitted by the team of EmCell doctors from Kyiv, Ukraine. We much appreciate a professional and transparent peer-review process from Auctores. All research Doctors are so grateful to your Editorial Office and Auctores Publishing support! I amiably wish our article publication maintained a top quality of your International Scientific Journal. My best wishes for a prosperity of the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Hope our scientific relationship and cooperation will remain long lasting. Thank you very much indeed. Kind regards, Dr. Andriy Sinelnyk Cell Therapy Center EmCell
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. It was truly a rewarding experience to work with the journal “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. The peer review process was insightful and encouraging, helping us refine our work to a higher standard. The editorial office offered exceptional support with prompt and thoughtful communication. I highly value the journal’s role in promoting scientific advancement and am honored to be part of it. Best regards, Meng-Jou Lee, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital.
Dear Editorial Team, Journal-Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, “Publishing my article with Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions has been a highly positive experience. The peer-review process was rigorous yet supportive, offering valuable feedback that strengthened my work. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional professionalism, prompt communication, and a genuine commitment to maintaining the highest scientific standards. I am very pleased with the publication quality and proud to be associated with such a reputable journal.” Warm regards, Dr. Mahmoud Kamal Moustafa Ahmed
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews’, I appreciate the opportunity to publish my article with your journal. The editorial office provided clear communication during the submission and review process, and I found the overall experience professional and constructive. Best regards, Elena Salvatore.
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews Herewith I confirm an optimal peer review process and a great support of the editorial office of the present journal
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. I am really grateful for the peers review; their feedback gave me the opportunity to reflect on the message and impact of my work and to ameliorate the article. The editors did a great job in addition by encouraging me to continue with the process of publishing.
Dear Cecilia Lilly, Editorial Coordinator, Endocrinology and Disorders, Thank you so much for your quick response regarding reviewing and all process till publishing our manuscript entitled: Prevalence of Pre-Diabetes and its Associated Risk Factors Among Nile College Students, Sudan. Best regards, Dr Mamoun Magzoub.
